Saturday, December 05, 2009

Microcinema Flashback - Things My Nine-Year Old Daughter Taught Me About Acting (2003)

From March 2003, lessons I learned from my daughter, Dorothea, during the shooting of our DV feature called The Box.

*****

Things My Nine-Year Old Daughter Taught Me About Acting
By Pete Bauer

When shooting the DV feature, THE BOX, one of the main characters ended up being played by my nine-year old daughter, Dorothea. Even though she had never acted before, I knew she was perfect for the role because:
  1. she took direction well,
  2. she has a natural talent with words
  3. since she was my daughter I could make her work whenever I needed. :)
It was through coaching my daughter in THE BOX that I came across some things that may help other micro-budget filmmakers working with non-actors.

The entire purpose of "acting" is to look like your NOT acting and that's where non-actors get into trouble... they try too hard. But here are some tips that you can use to get a stronger performance out of your non-actors.

Relaxation: This is probably the hardest things for a non-actor to achieve. Relaxation comes from comfort and the fact that you're using non-actors means that, more than likely, you're dealing with people who haven't spent a lot of time in front of the camera. So, getting them to relax in front of it can be difficult. This tension often manifests itself with a nervous giggle or an incessant smile on their face. And then they'll "act" for you, which is exactly what you want to avoid. So, here are some things you can say to non-actors to alleviate the pressure:
  • Tell them that you'll shoot as many takes as necessary. If they need 100 takes to get it right, fine, no problem. And, for most non-actors, it may take 10 or 12 takes to get them comfortable.
  • Tell them that your sole job is to make them look as good as possible, which is true, and that you'll do whatever you can to help them do that.
  • Let them understand your appreciation for their contributing to the project. Let them know that, without them, this couldn't happen and empathize with the awkward situation they're in.
  • When they screw up, joke with them, keep the atmosphere light. If they sense you're at all tense or frustrated, they'll lose whatever relaxtion they've acheived.
  • One final thing you can try is, after a take, tell them that you got the take you wanted, but that you want to do a couple more for safety. Even if their last take was lousy, when they think that you've got a take you can use, they'll often sigh and you'll see the burden of acting lifted off their shoulders. You'll find that they're suddenly relaxed and these next few "safety takes" are the ones that will end up in the finished product.
Know Your Actor's Weaknesses: It's important to know what your actors can and cannot do BEFORE shooting starts.
  • Have your actors run lines together, going over the scene again and again. Let them do this for as long as they need, because it will save you a lot of time when the camera's rolling.
  • While they're running lines, throw in some direction (move here on this line, don't get so angry, etc.) See how they respond. You'll get a better idea as to what will and will not work, what type of direction they respond to and what they can't process.

You should also find out if they are "first take" actors or "last take" actors.
  • First take actors do their best work on the first take and only get weaker and more stilted the more they redo the scene.
  • Last take actors get better and more relaxed with each take and their best performance is the last one you shoot. Fortunately, most actors fall into this category.

Find out if your actor prefers "line readings" or more subtle direction.
  • A line reading is when you say the line exactly as you want it to be said, with the tone, inflection, urgency, etc. The actor will then copy how you said the line.
  • Some people need to make their line readings their own and you'll need to make them understand why they're saying the line... which leads me to the next category...

Lines vs. Logic: Most non-actors spend a lot of energy worrying about getting their lines right... too much time and it shows. Bad acting doesn't come from how they look, but how they sound... their words just don't sound believable. This usually comes from putting too much focus on making sure each word in the sentence are in the proper order instead of understanding exactly why they are saying what they're saying. It's like turning a line "Can't you show me how you feel?" into something as daunting as memorizing "5463 511 58914 654860644 654699." When you see an actor investing more time in the order of their lines than in the meaning behind them, try the following:
  • Take a moment to make sure they understand the logic behind the words. Make sure that they focus on WHY they are saying something, as opposed to the exact words they are saying. If a scene is written well enough, and the actor can understand the logic behind their lines, then they will eventually understand that the only appropriate line to say next is "Can't you show me how you feel?"
  • That understanding of logic also needs to work for a scene. In THE BOX I had one long scene that had to be shot in single take. So, I went through it with the actors, breaking the scene into sections, or "beats". I explained the logic behind the words and the logic behind the beats. So, instead of them having to memorize a LONG scene, they put together a bunch of short beats that made sense to them. For example: The first beat you want to make him angry. The second beat you want him to apologize. The third beat your are sorry for pushing him too hard.
  • Let them paraphrase. Unless an exact line is necessary for the plot, if you see an actor is stumbling over words, then tell them to put it into their own words. Simply ask them "what are you trying to say?" They'll first try to recite their lines, but don't let them. Tell them to tell you, in their own words, what they are trying to convey. Then, tweak the line to fit how they feel comfortable saying it. This allows them to take ownership of the line, they feel like they're contributing and their performance will be more believable. And, what you'll usually find is that, once they put it into their own words, they eventually end up using your original dialogue, except they now understand what they're saying.
These are a few tips that I learned when directing my daughter and other actors in the making of THE BOX. Nothing pulls an audience out of a story like bad acting. So, do everything you can to get the strongest, most sincere performance you can from your actors. In the end, you'll have a more successful project and you'll be living up to your promise... to make the actors look as good as possible.

Tuesday, December 01, 2009

Tick... Tick... Tick...

Well, here we are... the last month of this blogs existence.

Since I've been turning these blogs into books, I've indulged myself a bit by posting some old, but entertaining articles about microcinema from a few years back... I wanted to have them documented somehow and this seemed like a practical way.

But, I will be adding some blog entries here before we close up shop.

I am very active on our Sonlight Pictures blog, so don't be a stranger over there. Would love to hear your comments about our thoughts and our projects.

So, enjoy the last 31 days of Surviving in Safety Harbor.

It's been a long five year run. Enjoyable, challenging and fun.

Monday, November 30, 2009

Microcinema Flashback - Front Row at the Saints and Sinners Film Festival (2002)

Our short film Justice was showing at the local Saints and Sinners Film Festival in August of 2002. Below, I share my thoughts on the unique experience.

*****

Front Row at the Saints and Sinners Film Festival
By Pete Bauer

While the rest of the REwind community was recuperating from the 2002 RMAs, I attended a similar festival in St. Petersburg, called the Saints and Sinners Film Festival. The festival was very well attended by a varied group of independent film fans... everyone from metal goths, to tan yuppies, to spike-haired punks, to parents and grand-parents... they were all there to support local micro-budget filmmakers. Held in downtown St. Pete at the State Theater, this usual haven of up and coming metal and rock bands was quickly transformed into an underground, indie-edge style showcase of aspiring filmmakers, with uncomfortable chairs, over-priced drinks and pizza and a great amount of enthusiasm and communal support... it was perfect.

Saints & Sinners The festival started at 4:00 p.m. and the line formed around the block. Though there were some kinks in actually getting people into the theater in a timely manner (after all, it's frickin' August in Florida! Open the doors early and let us get in the air conditioning!), no one seemed to mind. The festival, which separated the entries into non-horror (Saints) and horror (Sinners), showcased projects made by Florida filmmakers. Feature projects were interspersed with shorts and the festival concluded with the premiere of TOXIC AVENGER 4: CITIZEN TOXIE. As most of you know, I am not a fan of horror movies... at least the real bloody ones, but I really wanted to show my support to the fest so I sat quietly, hoping I wouldn't get grossed out. And, to my surprise, I wasn't at all. The Sinner projects were horror, but not gory, which I appreciated.

Now, I'm not sure if this was intended by the festival organizers at Renegage Films, but the best of the line-up came within the first four hours of this ten hour event. The fest opened with a local shot-on-video pseudo-documentary called BLEED, which was eerily like THE LAST BROADCAST. It was a nice project to start the festival and the audience was eager to show their support with appropriate hoops and yells. It was then followed by an effective film short called UNRAVELING AMELIA, about an old woman's trip into insanity as a result of being snowed in at a remote cabin. The highlight of the fest actually came from one of the guys at Renegade Films. He was home with the kids one day and threw together an absolutely hilarious and adorable short called WONDERBOY. It rocked! Other quality films were IT'S ONLY YOUR IMAGINATION and the very funny Clerks take-off called CLARKS, which ended with a hilarious homage to THE BREAKFAST CLUB.


Other projects were either not effective or just not that good. CHILD OF THE APOCALYPSE, about a Satanist having the Anti-Christ, though trying to be satircal look at tabloid media, was far too blasphemous for my tastes. And LOOKING IN THE FISHBOWL, a Crystal Reel Award winning short film, was very funny, but seemed to go out of it's way to bash Catholics. Being a card carrying Catholic, I couldn't help but ask the simple question... WHY? I'll never say Catholicism, or any other religion, is perfect. But, attacking any of them without it actually meaning something just seems lazy and a waste of a good story-telling opportunity. Falls into that oh-so-typical "rebelling against the institutions" thing that just isn't that original to me... so high-schoolish... rebellion-lite. But, that's just my opinion.

As all of you know, I have GREAT respect for anyone who can put a film together, not matter what the end quality. We've all been there and know that even unsuccessful projects take a hell of a lot of work. That being said, the worst short of the day was easily a mafia story called HIT & MISS... it was obviously their first effort. Shaky camera moves, bad audio, bad logic and bad framing all combined to make this one that will quickly fade from my long term memory. And one of the most memorable shorts was called GOOD GOLLY MISS DOLLY... it was so bad, it was charming. The story, about two hillbillies arguing over the love of Dolly (a peeing goat) was memorable because one of the guys kept his face down the entire time, obviously reading the script (which was visible on the table). It was hilarious. You end up loving those types of things even more because you know that these people have had no real training, yet are still driven to make movies. It was inspiring, in an odd sort of way.

Now, I'll admit, I must be getting old, because I could not make it through the entire festival. I ended up leaving after CLARKS at around 11:30 p.m. Unfortunately, there were some shorts I really wanted to see, but my eyes were starting to glaze over and I was struggling to pay attention. I didn't want to do the filmmakers an injustice by not paying attention, so after 7 1/2 hours I hit the road and headed home.

Major kudos go to the guys at Renegade Films for all the time and effort in pulling this whole thing together. I'm sure Jon and the Linns know what a Herculean task that can be. I was pleasantly surprised at the overflowing crowd that attended the event. There's obviously a larger mirco-budget film community in the area than I had expected. The only real down side was that I was hoping the event would have lended itself to being more conducive for networking with like-minded filmmakers. However, the nature of the venue and the tight schedule limited that opportunity. Perhaps, in future fests, there will be more of a chance to just hang out and talk shop with other filmmakers.

From what I hear, the guys at Renegade are trying to get together another festival... perhaps as soon as November. So, any micro-budget filmmakers out there, especially those located in Florida, make sure to submit your stuff and plan to attend. If the upcoming fests are as successful as this first effort, it can easily become one of the top mirco-budget festivals in the country... second to the RMAs, of course!