Monday, March 20, 2006

Liberal Spin - Abortion and Ave Maria

The following was made known to me by a friend...

In a story in the St. Pete Times about the two recent deaths by women taking the abortion RU-486 pill, it was determined that Planned Parenthood had told these two women to take the pill in a way that was in conflict with the FDA approved instructions and therefore caused their deaths.

What is so interesting and biased in this reporting is that Planned Parenthood is mentioned only as "the organization" in the beginning of the story and only identified by name later. Why? Because this was a front page story and the editors obviously didn't want Planned Parenthood to get a bad name to the casual reader, so they called PP "the organization" on the front page and didn't mention it by name until the story continued on deep into the section of the newspaper.

You can read the entire article online HERE, but you won't get the full effect unless you're holding a newspaper in your hand.

Secondly, where's the public outrage against Planned Parenthood? They are responsible not only for the deaths of the innocent babies that were aborted, but of those two mis-guided mothers as well. Where's the call to justice now?

In another subtle liberal spin, I recently read an article about the creation of the Ave Maria city and campus down near Naples, Florida. I don't have an online link handy, but in it the author of the article tells about the upcoming battle over the ACLU against the plans for this Catholic city (no birth control, no abortions available in city limits, etc.). In this article, the writer mentions that the city is being built near Naples in a location where migrant farm workers used to work. Why is that sentence in there? Does it have anything to do with the subject of the article? No. It's there to make it seem like this city creation was at the expense of the poor migrant farm workers.

I have two reactions to this. First, the migrant farm workers are probably not U.S. citizens, so I don't care. Second, I'd bet those migrant workers, and more, are currently being hired by the construction companies building the city itself.

So, when you read the paper, look for these subtle ways the liberal media spins the story toward their social or political opinion. They're tricky, but we're smarter.

1 comment:

Pete Bauer said...

I emailed the following letter to the St. Pete Times...

----- Original Message -----
From: pete@localtalentfilms.com
To: national@sptimes.com
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:44 PM
Subject: Comments sent from Contact Us


To Whom It May Concern:

I was curious about your article about the two deaths of women taking RU-486 (http://www.sptimes.com/2006/03/18/Worldandnation/Abortion_pill_to_blam.shtml). Why was Planned Parenthood not identified as the organization responsible until midway through the article? It’s called “the organization” prior to that. I can’t remember a time previously where a paper purposely did not identify a person or organization potentially responsible for someone’s death until after the story continued off of the front page and deep into the section of the paper.

Seems to me to be a decision to protect Planned Parenthood from negative press to the casual reader that doesn't read the rest of the article later on in the paper. Can you explain that decision?

Sincerely,

Pete Bauer

I got the following response:

----- Original Message -----
From: National@sptimes.com
To: pete@localtalentfilms.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: Comments sent from Contact Us


mr. bauer,

i'm not sure there was anything purposeful in not identifying Planned Parenthood prior to the ""jump'' of the story. however, it would have been better to identify ""the organization'' higher up in the story. i've forwarded your message to the editor of the A Section and the copy chief, who is responsible for the copy editors for the section.

regards,

natalie watson